|
|
| Author |
Message |
mikep
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 765
Location: Austin, TX
|
|
Posted: 29 August 2010, 19:42 PM Post subject: IDE wait time too short for large project |
|
|
I have a native mode project with 8 source files. If I use F5 (Go), then the compilation on a fast machine is still too slow for the IDE timeout. I get the "...commands still executing that must complete..." message. I assume there is a configuration setting to change this timeout?
I found the following setting "command.project.go.build.first" but changing it to a zero still resulted in a rebuild of the code. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dkinzer Site Admin
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 2499
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Posted: 29 August 2010, 20:49 PM Post subject: Re: IDE wait time too short for large project |
|
|
| mikep wrote: | | I assume there is a configuration setting to change this timeout? | Yes, command.go.wait, with units of milliseconds, e.g. | Code: | | command.go.wait=8000 | waits up to 8 seconds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mikep
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 765
Location: Austin, TX
|
|
Posted: 29 August 2010, 20:52 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| The timeout worked. Is command.project.go.build.first=0 functional? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dkinzer Site Admin
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 2499
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Posted: 29 August 2010, 22:59 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| mikep wrote: | | Is command.project.go.build.first=0 functional? | I'll have to check the code to be certain but I believe that it is not. A change was made recently to always build before a download because some users were reporting that they would make a change, hit F5, and the existing executable would be downloaded without re-building. Since that change was made there have been no further reports of this issue.
You can still download without building by using the File|Download menu entry. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|