GTBecker
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 472
Location: Cape Coral
|
|
Posted: 15 December 2006, 22:30 PM Post subject: |
|
|
The sensor manufacturer might be able to tell you if the device will suffer from continuous exposure to hydrogen but, despite that answer, I think I would avoid allowing hydrogen access to the electronics.
You might put a liquid trap in the pressure line, much like a vanity sink U-trap, that would isolate one pressure side gas from the other, presumably air. I remember, also, that IBM used a membrane isolator in vacuum-column tape drives to prevent oil mist, I think, from reaching the tape. It was a disk of some flexible material between two mouth-to-mouth funnels, with a hose off each end. Equalized, somehow, that might work, too.
Actually, it is that membrane displacement that you might measure to determine differential pressure and, for that matter, the liquid U-trap is a manometer, too.
Tom |
|
GTBecker
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 472
Location: Cape Coral
|
|
Posted: 18 December 2006, 19:11 PM Post subject: |
|
|
Vic, I had a thought in the middle of the night. Although this method does not use the Sensiron sensor, can you use the gas bag itself as a displacement diaphram?
Suppose you mounted the equivalent of an embroidery hoop in the side of the balloon, making a taught surface that is nearly flat when inflated at ground level. At altitude, the surface will bulge outward as the bag expands. Measure the bulge, calibrated for the material?
Tom |
|