|
|
| Author |
Message |
spamiam
Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 661
|
|
Posted: 12 December 2007, 3:44 AM Post subject: Differential ADC |
 |
|
Here is a little program demonstrating how to do differential ADC. It was written for the ZX24, but the technique is good for all processors
-Tony
| Description: |
|
Download |
| Filename: |
Test_diff_adc.zip |
| Filesize: |
2.77 KB |
| Downloaded: |
3084 Time(s) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dkinzer
Site Admin
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 2493
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Posted: 13 December 2007, 4:46 AM Post subject: |
|
|
| In differential mode, it is convenient to use the ADLAR bit to force the result into bits 15-6. The advantage of doing this is that the result can be directly used as a 16-bit signed value. Obviously, an adjustment needs to be made in the ADC-to-voltage conversion equation to compensate for the fact that the value is 64 times what it should be.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spamiam
Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 661
|
|
Posted: 13 December 2007, 13:43 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| dkinzer wrote: | | In differential mode, it is convenient to use the ADLAR bit to force the result into bits 15-6. The advantage of doing this is that the result can be directly used as a 16-bit signed value. Obviously, an adjustment needs to be made in the ADC-to-voltage conversion equation to compensate for the fact that the value is 64 times what it should be. |
Good point. I was wondering about doing something with the ADLAR bit. It is an easy mod to make. I had to do a little extra math to check if the value is greater than 511, then subtract 1024 from the value to get the correct signed value.
The problem with having a result that is 64 times larger is that some people might think that there is 64 times greater resolution!
I suppose it would be simple enough to right shift the ADC reading by 6 bits to restore the correct magnitude. (Right shifting will preserve the sign of a signed integer, right?) I am reasonably sure that always doing a quick right shift will be faster than deciding when to sometimes subtract 1024.
| Code: | dim ADC_Reading as Integer
'NOTE: ADLAR bit is set
ADC_Reading = ShR(CInt(Register.ADC) ,6) |
I will make this modification to the code and post a new version. Thanks for the input!
-Tony
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dkinzer
Site Admin
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 2493
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Posted: 13 December 2007, 14:31 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| spamiam wrote: | | I am reasonably sure that always doing a quick right shift will be faster than deciding when to sometimes subtract 1024. |
If the value will ultimately be converted to some other units (e.g. voltage, pressure, etc.) the scaling can be combined into that conversion, often at no additional cost since those conversions generally involve multiplication and division anyway.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spamiam
Joined: 13 Nov 2005
Posts: 661
|
|
Posted: 13 December 2007, 16:30 PM Post subject: |
|
|
| dkinzer wrote: | | If the value will ultimately be converted to some other units (e.g. voltage, pressure, etc.) the scaling can be combined into that conversion, often at no additional cost since those conversions generally involve multiplication and division anyway. |
Right. But for the little demo program, I wanted it to be as general-purpose as possible. I was thnking that some users might transplant the code directly into their progran as-is, then further translate the data as needed.
-Tony
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
ZBasic Home
Forum Rules
Memberlist
Usergroups
RSS Feed
Site Search
Links
Download
Digests and Subscriptions
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Register